A Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) study published in
this month's issue of The Journal of Pediatrics demonstrated that
future pediatricians underestimate the value of teaching and research
in their careers. For the nation, that could mean fewer pediatric
specialists and researchers.
The results speak largely about female pediatricians and their
values, as females accounted for more than 70 percent of pediatric
residencies in 2002, and numbers continue to climb.
"The findings of this study are sounding alarm bells because we have
an unprecedented number of basic research discoveries and new therapies
that are ready for testing," said Bernie Maria, M.D., MUSC Darby
Children's Research Institute executive director and principal
investigator of the study. "Although doing research may be more
important to established doctors, the low value placed on scholarship,
especially among women entering the field of pediatrics, is
problematic. We must do a better job of mentoring talented young
investigators so children can benefit fully from today's research."
Study participants included recently graduated medical students
registered to use the Careers in Medicine (CiM) website, operated by
the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), who chose
pediatrics as their specialty and who had been in residency training
for 2 years or less.
Participants completed the Physician Values in Practice Scale
(PVIPS), a measure of personal values related to medicine which
includes prestige (desire to be recognized by others as a top
physician), service (desire to care for others regardless of financial
gains or other rewards), autonomy (importance of freedom, independence,
and control over clinical decision making), lifestyle (desire for a
predictable and stable work schedule), management (desire to supervise
others), and scholarly pursuits (desire to engage in clinical or basic
research, scholarship, academic medicine, and teaching).
When compared to other values, autonomy and lifestyle were the
top-ranked values overall among medical students from all disciplines.
This finding is interesting given the current shift to emphasizing
teams of physicians and scientists.
Similar to other disciplines, future pediatricians see freedom,
independence, control over clinical decision making, and work-life
balance as most important.
At the national level, George Richard, Ph.D., director of the
Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Careers in Medicine
Program, sees a paradox in what is valued most by future pediatricians
when compared with what is needed to maintain and advance the
pediatrics field.
"Medical students need to find a place in the world of work where
they can function most effectively," he said. "Our research points to
some of the important factors that help them do that, while at the same
time informing educators about the impact of the environment on the
ability to reach one's full potential."
The authors suggest the value gaps could be the result of low
numbers of women in academic leadership roles and residents' current
role models may underestimate the importance of scholarship in
environments where clinical quotas are the goal.
"We will now examine generational differences in values because
older generations have the responsibility to prepare this new wave of
young physicians, and to close gaps in projected workforce shortages in
pediatrics and other fields of medicine," Maria said.
For a full discussion of future pediatricians and their values, and to access the full article, visit http://www.jpeds.com/article/PIIS0022347607006555/fulltext .